But none of the tactical innovations had nearly the effect on future wars as two of Grant’s innovations – innovations as surely credited to Grant as greatness is to Robert E. New formations like those employed by Union Colonel Emory Upton at Spotsylvania and Confederate Lieutenant General James Longstreet at Chickamauga and The Wilderness demonstrated the power of attacks by formations with depth instead of breadth. The use of combined arms (infantry, artillery, cavalry) tactics by generals like Union Major General Philip Sheridan and Confederate Major General Patrick Cleburne proved effective. The strength of the defensive was widely recognized as early as the third year of the war. The operational level includes decisions regarding when, where and under what conditions to engage the enemy in battle – or when to refuse to engage the enemy.5ĭuring the Civil War, tactics changed as new equipment, especially the grooved rifle and the entrenching tool, gained prominence. Operations link the strategic level with the tactical level operations are the use of tactics to achieve strategic objectives. Activities at the strategic level reflect national policy objectives, and military strategy reflects the application of military power to meet national policy objectives. The Marines identify tactics as the lowest level of war, beneath the strategic and the operational levels. "Tactics" is defined in one dictionary as "the science and art of using a fighting force to the best advantage having regard to the immediate situation of combat."4Alternatively, the Marine Corps equates the tactical level with winning battles and combat engagements, using firepower and maneuver, in a particular time and place. These are strategy, operations and tactics. There are three levels of decision-making and actions within war. Much as been written about the North’s successful strategy.2Many other books describe the tactical changes that occurred during the war,3 but few authors highlight the operational change introduced by Grant. While Grant’s strategic vision was vitally important to victory, this paper concentrates on his operational, as opposed to tactical or strategic, innovation. ![]() Changes he introduced altered future warfare and accelerated the defeat the South. He was innovative on both a strategic and operational level. The Civil War has been alternatively described as the last of the Napoleonic Wars or the first of the modern wars.1 Clearly it was a transitional war and one man, more than any other, can be credited with making the transition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |